HomeSolutions › Indian Planning Engineers
For planning engineers and DGM Contracts · NHAI, CPWD, metro, and rail

Built for the person who owns the hindrance register.

Hindrances logged the way the Authority Engineer expects, EOT applications drafted in NHAI or CPWD format, and a running record that does not have to be rebuilt from memory months later.

Rs 88,100 Cr
Contractor claims raised in arbitration against NHAI over a recent five-year window
~36%
Share of claimed value actually awarded on settled NHAI arbitration cases in that window
7–15 days
The notice window many NHAI and CPWD contracts treat as a condition precedent
THE DESK · PLANNING ENGINEER / DGM CONTRACTS

The hindrance register is the whole game. Most of it is reconstructed too late.

2026 IN INDIAN HIGHWAY ARBITRATION

The Authority is out-documenting contractors

A run of 2026 arbitration awards illustrates the pattern plainly. These are public results reported in the trade press, cited below.

ProjectContractor claimAward
Bareilly–Sitapur BOT, Uttar PradeshRs 3,177 Cr (30 claims)Rs 46 Cr plus interest
Kamrej–Chalthan, NH-48 GujaratRs 174.49 CrRs 54 lakh
Panipat–Jalandhar HighwayRs 8,375 CrRs 819.96 Cr (net of NHAI counterclaim)
Tumkur–Chitradurga, KarnatakaRs 1,202 Cr awarded to NHAI

NHAI has publicly attributed these outcomes to digital project monitoring and strong contemporaneous documentation. A January 2026 circular also removed arbitration as a dispute route for claims above Rs 10 crore, pushing more disputes toward earlier, better-evidenced conciliation. Contracts issued by NHAI, CPWD, and other public authorities commonly treat timely written notice as a condition precedent, and a notice window as short as 7, 14, or 15 days is enough to extinguish an otherwise valid claim. The lesson for contractors is the same either way: the register you keep from day one is what decides the outcome, not the argument you make at the end.

NHAI EPCNHAI HAMCPWD GCCSTATE PWD GCCMETRO & RAIL PACKAGESHINDRANCE REGISTER EXPORT
HOW IT WORKS FOR YOUR DESK
01

Hindrance register, in the format the AE recognizes

Sl. No., description, date of occurrence, date of removal, period, responsible agency, remarks, and Authority Engineer countersignature status, one-click export.

02

Dual clock for the same event

A notified hindrance and a separate authority correspondence trail are tracked together, so nothing falls out of sync between your internal log and your outbound letters.

03

EOT applications in authority style

Formal letter format with reference numbering conventions your team already uses, not a generic Western claim template relabelled.

Send your next NHAI or CPWD package

Send a contract, your delay events, and whatever records exist, tidy or not. A structured draft comes back in 48 hours.

Project
Highway, metro, or rail EPC package, any stage
Deliverable
EOT claim draft · notice status check · evidence gap list · annexure pack
Rev / Status
REV A · DRAFT FOR EXPERT REVIEW
Issued within
48 hours
PRICING · INDIA

Priced the way Indian infra budgets actually work

PlanPriceWhat's included
48-hour draft (pilot)Rs 25,000Same offer, repriced to Indian consultant economics
Per-claim standardRs 50,000–1,00,000Still far below arbitration-stage expert fees
Company AnnualRs 2.4–4.8 Lakh/yrHindrance register, deadline engine, and 4 drafts included, sold per company, unlimited users
Per-projectRs 60,000–1,00,000/yrMatches how Indian contractors budget: project-wise rather than company-wise
QUERIES FROM PLANNING ENGINEERS

Asked in every first call

Does the hindrance register export match what our Authority Engineer expects to see?
Yes. The export format mirrors standard Indian hindrance register practice: Sl. No., description, dates of occurrence and removal, period, responsible agency, remarks, and AE countersignature status.
We work on both NHAI EPC and CPWD projects. Does the format change?
Each project carries its own contract family profile, so an EOT application drafted for an NHAI EPC package looks like an authority letter with a hindrance annexure, while a CPWD project follows that form's own extension-application conventions.
Our records are in binders and shared drives, not one system.
That is the normal starting point. Upload what exists in whatever form it is in; the register and evidence locker are built to absorb scattered records, not require a clean system first.
Is this only useful once a dispute is already brewing?
The opposite. It is most valuable from day one of a package, logging hindrances as they happen, because a contemporaneous record beats a reconstructed one every time, and that gap is exactly what recent arbitration awards have turned on.
SHEET 09 · CERTIFICATIONS OF CONDUCT

Why you can put your name near it

Draft for expert review

DraftMyEOT is not a law firm and never claims to be. Every output is a draft, built to be reviewed and signed by your contracts lead or consultant.

Nothing invented, ever

No dates, events, or clause numbers appear that you did not supply. Every paragraph shows the evidence reference it was built from.

Your data, walled off

Each company's workspace is isolated, documents sit in private storage, and consultants see only the project they were invited to.

Sources

  1. Standing Committee on Transport, Parliament of India, as reported by Deccan Herald, “Contractors claim Rs 88,000 crore in highway project disputes” — deccanherald.com
  2. NHAI press releases on Bareilly–Sitapur, Kamrej–Chalthan, Panipat–Jalandhar, and Tumkur–Chitradurga arbitration outcomes, as reported by Indian Masterminds, DeshGujarat, and Newkerala (2026)
  3. Circular dated 12 January 2026, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, on excluding arbitration above Rs 10 crore, as discussed by Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas — corporate.cyrilamarchandblogs.com
  4. “How To Resolve A Construction Dispute In India,” Global Law Experts, on notice-of-claim windows under NHAI and CPWD contracts — globallawexperts.com